BBS Radio TVSociety & Culture

BBS Radio TV is engaged in the production and distribution of original live talk radio. We engineer and produce over 120 hours of talk show programming every week since 2004. A network of powerful personalities providing illuminating information!


BBS Radio TV Station Streams

Sons of Liberty Radio, August 4, 2026

Wed, 05 Aug 2026
SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean

The Enemies Are In Plain Sight Acting Out As Your Saviors

When Saviors Serve the System: Surveillance, Political Theater, and Controlled Opposition

Summary

Enemies in Plain Sight
The program opens with prerecorded commentary criticizing Zionism, Theodor Herzl, the Rothschild family, Israeli policy, the Star of David, and the reduction of Palestinian territory. It then moves through a Christian constitutional disclaimer before Bradley Dean introduces the episode's central theme: people presented to the public as protectors or saviors may, in his view, be participating in the very systems that create the problems they claim to solve.

Public Health, Fauci, and Political Fundraising
Dean revisits claims made during an earlier interview with Dr. Tenpenny and attributes recent deaths of young athletes to mRNA injections, while asserting that Anthony Fauci and public-health institutions have escaped accountability. Caller Sal criticizes both Fauci and Rand Paul, and Dean expands the argument by accusing Paul and other conservative politicians of using public confrontation, fundraising, and televised hearings as substitutes for prosecution and justice.

Flock Cameras and the Fourth Amendment
A major portion of the episode focuses on Flock surveillance cameras, government access to collected data, and alleged abuses by law-enforcement personnel. Dean argues that the systems were introduced without legitimate delegated authority and frames public protests and camera removals as resistance to unconstitutional surveillance. A prerecorded Thomas Massie clip warns against trading privacy and freedom of movement for promises of security, although Dean criticizes Massie's proposed legislation as another delay rather than direct accountability.

Political Theater, J.D. Vance, and the Epstein Files
The host presents a prerecorded segment linking J.D. Vance's political rise to Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies, surveillance systems, and campaign support. He then plays a clip of Marjorie Taylor Greene describing resistance from Donald Trump, Mike Johnson, Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice to releasing Epstein-related files. Dean agrees that the subject demands accountability but criticizes Greene's focus and argues that the full range of victims and alleged participants must be confronted.

Provocateurs and Controlled Opposition
In the final portion, Dean describes Jake Lang as a paid provocateur who is attempting to inflame conflict between Christians and Muslims. He condemns rock-throwing and other violence while arguing that lawful action should be used against both illegal immigration and those he accuses of enabling it. He also attacks Alex Jones, Russell Brand, and Candace Owens as media figures who, in his view, receive promotion while functioning as controlled opposition rather than genuine defenders of constitutional law.

Faith, Justice, and Citizen Action
Throughout the broadcast, Dean grounds his arguments in a Christian biblical worldview and repeatedly presents Jesus Christ as the only true Savior. He urges listeners to know the Constitution, recognize alleged violations of delegated authority, reject political appeasement, and demand justice rather than accept speeches, hearings, or proposed bills as meaningful action. Calls, station promotions, church invitations, fundraising appeals, and media-network advertisements are interwoven with the central message that organized citizens possess power when they unite and act.

Cathy Durant Show, August 4, 2026

Tue, 04 Aug 2026
S3EP1, Dr. Steven Nia, a true visionary and entrepreneur with over 20 years of experience in the entertainment and technology industries

Reinventing Film: AI Production, Micro-Dramas, and the Future of Distribution

From Entertainment Law to a Technology-Driven Studio

Cathy Durant welcomes Dr. Steven Nia, founder of Wardour Studios, for a wide-ranging conversation about the changing film and entertainment business. Nia traces the studio’s name to a childhood visit to Wardour Street in London, where he says he briefly met Alfred Hitchcock. He explains that the W1 symbol used by the company is connected to that London district and carries personal meaning for him. The discussion then moves to the studio’s first decade, its origins, and the partnership between Nia and chief operating officer Angelina Leo. Nia credits Leo’s media experience, discipline, and daily operational leadership as essential to the company’s development.

Visual Effects, Full Production, and AI-Assisted Filmmaking

Nia describes Wardour Studios as a company that began with an emphasis on technology, post-production, and visual effects. He explains that visual effects require creators to use imagination and technology to produce images and environments that often do not exist in real life. The studio has since expanded into full film and series production, production services, and location-based filmmaking. During the last three years, the company has also focused heavily on artificial-intelligence research and proprietary production tools. Nia argues that AI is changing cost, execution, creativity, monetization, and distribution more fundamentally than earlier transitions from film to digital production.

Partnerships, Intellectual Property, and Creative Control

The interview explores how creators can approach the studio and how projects are developed. Nia says that, although producers once needed a pitch deck and finished script, the studio can now begin with a simple idea and use its tools to develop scripts, scene breakdowns, and production roadmaps in a matter of days. He explains that Wardour generally avoids conventional work-for-hire arrangements when it is creatively involved and instead seeks an intellectual-property stake, often as an equal partner. According to Nia, the creator remains central while the studio adds creative, technical, and production value. He emphasizes that human beings still originate the imagination and own the intellectual property, while AI functions as a powerful assisting tool.

A New Model for Direct Content Distribution

Nia outlines a platform under development that is internally called W1, although he says that will not be its final public name. The proposed system would allow producers to upload completed content, establish pricing, subscriptions, territorial limits, age restrictions, and other distribution parameters, and then receive automated payments when the content is streamed. He presents the platform as an additional distribution channel rather than a replacement for theaters, broadcasters, established streaming services, film markets, or festivals. The underlying technology would also track intellectual-property ownership and distribute revenue among eligible participants, potentially including producers, directors, distributors, cast, and crew. Nia believes the model could make distribution and monetization accessible even to very small production companies.

Music Rights, Micro-Dramas, and Changing Viewing Habits

The conversation turns to music licensing and the growth of micro-dramas. Nia contrasts the older album-sales model with today’s mix of concerts, merchandising, streaming services, and licensed music libraries. He says the planned platform could eventually support music creators by preserving ownership while allowing licensing for films, series, and standalone listening. Nia also describes short-form dramatic series as a rapidly expanding global business and discusses Invincible, an 81-episode micro-series that he says was created as a showcase for 100 percent AI-generated content. He and Durant agree that short-form viewing, feature films, theaters, and television can coexist rather than forcing audiences to choose only one format.

Production Economics and the Wardour Filming Location

Nia estimates that an average short-drama production may cost around $100,000, depending on whether it is made traditionally, through a hybrid process, or with extensive AI assistance. He compares the total running time of 30 or 40 short episodes with that of a feature film and argues that the new production model can sharply reduce costs, including below-the-line expenses. The interview closes with a description of Wardour Studios’ Los Angeles County property, including a historic castle, a large backlot, a lake, helicopter pads, seasonal scenery, and a private aircraft landing strip under development. Nia says the location attracts filmmakers and helps create long-term creative relationships. Durant ends the program by inviting him to return for a future conversation.

SEO Keywords / Key Phrases

AI-assisted film production, independent film financing, film distribution platform, micro-drama production, intellectual property rights, post-production studios, visual effects technology, music licensing and monetization, film production costs, Hollywood filming locations

Translating Heart Intelligence, August 4, 2026

Tue, 04 Aug 2026
From Nervous-System Insight to Economic Policy: Translating Ideas with AI

From Embodied Feelings to Expressible Ideas

Justin and Kenna connect the second episode to their earlier discussion about turning feelings and ideas into language that can be shared with institutions or used to develop projects. Kenna explains that her work with artificial intelligence began as an attempt to understand how she makes decisions and experiences reality. She describes every action as beginning with a rapid yes-or-no choice that develops into a relationship with the surrounding environment. AI becomes a reflective tool that helps her observe and organize this process. The discussion establishes the episode’s central premise: personal insight can become practical language without requiring the person to begin as a policy expert.

The Nervous System as a Personal Governor

Kenna introduces the nervous system as a governor that regulates how much excitement, fear, uncertainty, or possibility a person can comfortably experience. The skydiving and lottery examples illustrate how a desired experience can become overwhelming when the body must process its emotional intensity. Training and repetition, as used by emergency personnel, can make difficult actions more familiar and reduce the emotional burden in the moment. Kenna connects calmness to safety, food, water, shelter, and a stable home environment. She argues that survival pressure can limit creativity and prevent people from pursuing ideas even when they consciously want to move forward.

Financial Systems and Collective Regulation

The conversation expands from individual nervous-system regulation to the collective effects of the financial system. Kenna acknowledges that modern systems provide valuable food distribution, medical care, transportation, and emergency services, but she also sees people becoming deeply entangled in the structures that provide those necessities. Because money affects access to survival needs, she describes it as a force that can govern the nervous system’s sense of stability. Justin and Kenna discuss rising rent, grocery costs, wages, and corporate profits as signs of an imbalance between the resources flowing upward and the support returning to workers and households. They frame sustainability not only as an economic question but also as a question of emotional and physiological pressure.

From a Stomach Economy to a Heart Economy

Kenna uses the stomach and heart as metaphors for two different economic relationships. In the stomach model, human time, attention, energy, and excitement enter a system that efficiently produces goods, services, infrastructure, and profit, while people’s qualitative and emotional experiences may be treated as waste. The heart model represents circulation and reciprocity because what enters the heart is returned through the body. She asks whether financial systems could recognize emotional well-being and create a more reciprocal flow of abundance. The metaphor helps her translate a difficult intuitive concern into language that can be explored through policy design.

Consent, Pilots, and a Temporary National Dividend

Consent becomes a core requirement in Kenna’s proposal because she sees the ability to say yes or no as essential to a sustainable system. She wants any program to be pilotable, reversible, scalable, transparent, and optional rather than imposed. Her proposed Dual-Channel National Dividend would draw separately from gains associated with automation and from tariff revenue. The money would be placed in an independently governed public trust, paid only from collected revenue, adjusted according to available funds, and supported by reserves. The proposal is presented as an 18-to-24-month economic shock absorber rather than a permanent guaranteed-income program.

AI as a Bridge Between Care and Policy

The episode concludes by emphasizing that people do not need perfect language or professional policy training to explore an idea they care about. AI can help reflect observations, test assumptions, organize concepts, and translate an embodied concern into language that policymakers or other institutions can understand. Kenna presents her Treasury proposal as one possible response to job disruption, tariff-related price pressure, and survival stress rather than as a final or flawless answer. Both speakers emphasize that human care, observation, consent, and judgment must remain central to the process. They preview a future discussion about housing, sustainability, and creating a stronger foundation for the next generation.

SEO Keywords / Key Phrases

nervous system regulation, artificial intelligence policy translation, automation dividend, tariff rebate proposal, temporary national dividend, economic shock stabilizer, financial system sustainability, consent-based economic policy, survival stress and cost of living, AI job displacement

Ask the Angel with Rachel Corpus, August 3, 2026

Tue, 04 Aug 2026
Ask The Angel With Rachel Corpus with Rachel Corpus

Ghosts, Grief, and the Angelic Tools That Help Us Listen
Rachel Corpus explores ghosts, spiritual imprints, house clearings, Lion’s Gate energy, runes, oracle cards, and caller readings, offering comfort around loss while encouraging listeners to trust intuition, set boundaries, and remember the spiritual guidance already within them.

Rachel Opens the Door to Ghosts and the Other Side

In this episode of Ask the Angel, Rachel Corpus welcomes listeners and begins with a question from Jerry in Carbondale, Illinois: if God loves everyone, why are there ghosts? Rachel answers through her own spiritual understanding, explaining that what people call ghosts are often not the full consciousness of a person, but an imprint, memory, or vibrational “movie” left behind after death. The transcript identifies Rachel Corpus as host and notes that spiritual, paranormal, afterlife, mediumship, and personal-loss statements are preserved as speaker statements rather than verified factual claims.

Ghosts as Imprints, Stories, and Repeating Memories

Rachel explains that, in her view, a person’s core consciousness goes to the next dimension, whether someone understands that as heaven, the afterlife, the quantum realm, or another spiritual plane. What remains here may be a time stamp, memory stamp, story, or energetic loop that people experience as a ghost. She distinguishes between residual hauntings that simply repeat and more intelligent hauntings that overlap with the living. Rachel also says some spirits may remain connected to homes, loved ones, unfinished learning, or familiar places, while others are not harmful and do not need intervention.

A House Clearing With Archangels Michael and Uriel

Rachel then tells a detailed story about helping a client whose older home appeared to carry an intense spiritual imprint connected to a violent past event near a shared well. She describes how the client’s physical symptoms seemed to mirror the violence connected to that imprint, and how Rachel asked Spirit for guidance. The protocol she describes includes creating a spiritual barrier around the home, calling on Archangel Michael for safety and Archangel Uriel to help the spirit cross over, using whiskey on a mirror as a portal, clearing the house afterward, placing water under the bed to reroute the energy of the well, and setting spoken boundaries around the home.

Amber’s Reading and a Message From Theseus

The first caller, Amber, asks about her son Theseus, who was “born sleeping,” as the anniversary of his passing approaches. Rachel tells Amber that Theseus is connected with her other children, especially Atticus, and describes him as wanting to be big, playful, and close to his brother’s energy. Rachel says Amber can know Theseus through Atticus, suggesting that Theseus looks through Atticus’s eyes and that the family’s spiritual blueprint is built more around time together than material things. The reading is tender and focused on helping Amber feel connection, recognition, and comfort around a child she did not get to know in life.

Lion’s Gate, Spiritual Receiving, and Divination Tools

Rachel then answers a listener question about the Lion’s Gate portal, which she describes as a period around August 8th connected to increased opening of the crown chakra, third eye, and psychic growth. She encourages listeners to ask their guides and angels to direct them toward the right information instead of getting lost in spiritual noise. Rachel says this year’s Lion’s Gate is connected to people becoming stronger receivers, with the body, cells, emotions, and energy field opening to more light and information. She then introduces runes, oracle cards, dowsing rods, trinkets, angel numbers, and other divination tools as spiritual “telephones,” while reminding listeners that they do not need anything outside themselves to connect.

Nikki, Misty, and Messages From Loved Ones

Caller Nikki asks whether someone she recently lost is okay and whether he has been trying to communicate. Rachel tells her that he is learning how to visit, move things, flicker lights, leave signs, and communicate through dreams, and reassures Nikki that it is really him and that he is okay. Later, Misty calls after finding Rachel through the Jeff Mara podcast and asks for a message from her brother Quentin. Rachel describes Quentin as joking, angelic, and communicating through beeps, sounds, and stopped devices, then answers Misty’s emotional question about whether Quentin’s passing was accidental or intentional, saying it was an accident while acknowledging the complexity of his state of mind.

Kathy’s Yard Spirit and the Week’s Closing Blessing

The final caller, Kathy, asks about a spirit in her yard who calls herself Evelyn and appears through a strong perfume scent. Rachel says Kathy is highly intuitive and, because the presence does not feel negative or enter the house, she does not see danger. She suggests that the spirit may be connected to Kathy’s own boundary system, reminding her to check whether living-world boundaries also need attention. Rachel closes by pulling cards for the audience, emphasizing the message to trust intuition, reminding listeners that they already have what they need inside themselves, promoting her Facebook, Instagram, email, custom runes, and upcoming Angel Talk podcast season, and signing off with love.

Prophecy in the Spotlight, August 3, 2026

Tue, 04 Aug 2026
Prophecy In The Spotlight with Daniel Goodwin and Dr. Charles Hiltibidal

Government UFOs, Secret Aircraft, and the Great End-Time Distraction
Brother Daniel Goodwin and Dr. Charles Hiltibidal examine UFO claims through the lens of secret military aviation, Roswell, Area 51, Cold War aircraft development, Hollywood influence, and Bible prophecy, arguing that many UFO narratives function as a government smokescreen and a spiritual distraction from Scripture.

Government UFOs and the Flying-Wing Mystery

In this episode of Prophecy in the Spotlight, Brother Daniel Goodwin introduces the topic as “government UFOs,” focusing on aircraft and secret technologies that may have appeared otherworldly to people who saw them before they understood what they were. He begins with a German World War II flying-wing aircraft, explaining that if someone in the 1940s had seen such a jet streak across the sky, they likely would have called it a UFO. The corrected transcript identifies Brother Daniel Goodwin as host, Dr. Charles Hiltibidal as co-host, and notes that the discussion’s order, theological framing, episode substance, and host claims were preserved.

German Engineering, World War II, and the Roots of Misidentification

Brother Goodwin and Dr. Hiltibidal discuss how advanced German engineering near the end of World War II could have changed the outcome of the war if certain aircraft technologies had reached mass production. They reflect on jet engines, flying-wing design, military experimentation, and the possibility that unfamiliar aircraft would have seemed impossible to ordinary observers at the time. This becomes their first major point: what many people interpret as extraterrestrial may instead be human engineering far beyond what the public knows or expects.

UFO Language, Hollywood, and Science-Fiction Prophecy

The hosts then trace how the language of UFOs developed after 1947, with Brother Goodwin explaining that the term “flying saucer” grew out of misinterpretation surrounding early sightings and newspaper reporting. He argues that Hollywood and science-fiction storytelling amplified that misunderstanding, turning unidentified aircraft into imagined visitors from outer space. From there, the discussion becomes theological, as Brother Goodwin criticizes prophecy teachers who, in his view, try to force science-fiction material into Bible prophecy instead of allowing Scripture to remain the superior text.

Roswell, Project Mogul, and the Cold War Smokescreen

Brother Goodwin and Dr. Hiltibidal revisit Roswell, Kenneth Arnold, mysterious wreckage, reports of flying saucers, weather-balloon explanations, dummy drops, and later references to Project Mogul. They present Roswell not as proof of alien life, but as an early Cold War episode involving military secrecy, experimental programs, and public confusion. The hosts repeatedly emphasize that they do not claim to know every detail, but they argue that secrecy around military projects helped fuel a public UFO mythology that government agencies could use as a convenient cover.

Area 51, U-2 Flights, and Secret Military Research

The conversation then moves to Area 51, which the hosts describe as a remote, secure site selected during the Cold War for secret testing by the CIA, Air Force, and Lockheed’s Skunk Works. Brother Goodwin discusses Project Aquatone, Kelly Johnson, and the U-2 Dragon Lady spy plane, emphasizing that early U-2 flights from the site contributed to widespread UFO sightings in the 1950s. He argues that many sightings involving actual mechanical objects in the sky were likely secret aircraft, advanced aviation programs, or experimental military technology rather than extraterrestrial craft.

Stealth Aircraft, Human Ingenuity, and the Days of Noah

Brother Goodwin and Dr. Hiltibidal expand the point through later aircraft, including the A-12 Oxcart, SR-71 Blackbird, stealth development, titanium construction, radar evasion, and high-speed aviation. They reject the idea that such technology came from alien research, arguing instead that God gave human beings minds capable of physics, mathematics, engineering, and innovation. Brother Goodwin connects this to the “days of Noah,” saying the biblical warning is not about returning aliens or fallen angels marrying women, but about human imagination, evil, and technology reaching dangerous levels while people live without regard for God.

UFO Deception, Ministry Resources, and the Rapture

In the closing section, the hosts return to the spiritual meaning of the topic. Brother Goodwin says government encouragement of UFO stories became a cover or “smokescreen” for secret research and may still distract people today. He promotes his books UFOs: Truth or Fable and The Great End-Time Distraction, urging listeners to keep science fiction in its proper place and Scripture at the center. The episode closes with ministry-support appeals, missionary-radio outreach, a gospel invitation, and Brother Goodwin’s statement that he believes UFOs will be blamed for the rapture as part of a final end-time deception.

Send Message to BBS Radio TV

Verified Podcast

BBS Radio TV Twitter Feed

BBS Radio TV Facebook Timeline

Reviews for BBS Radio TV